When working as a correspondent for the Times News in the late 1990s to early 2000s, instructions were passed on from News Corp that future articles were to present both sides of a topic. This required submissions to include opposition views on any subject, resulting in articles that often spread opinions and statements meant to give equal weight to the original subject--early "alternative facts." That directive, plus the fact that correspondents and reporters were prevented from writing letters to the editor, resulted in my resignation. At least an LTE allowed clear presentation without interference. The Comments section was available for objections.
If you wonder why Fox "News" was hit with massive damages in the Dominion lawsuit, consider this. Their news consists almost entirely of alternative facts, usually without available evidence, also without inclusion of actual facts debunking their reports. Thus viewers are presented with such things as multiple appearances by James Comer without proof of charges in his never ending pursuit of a Biden impeachment. Viewers can only look forward to further farcical presentations on the same level.
This past week, Fox correspondent Lucas Tomlinson reported how Biden faces continuing questions about his age. What Tomlinson failed to report was that his "evidence" was a video of a question shouted to Biden about his age that actually came from Tomlinson himself. Yet another refinement of Fox methodology.
Jason Donner, a former Fox News producer recently sued the network charging that he was fired for objecting to Fox coverage of vaccines, the 2020 election, and the Jan. 6 Capitol attack.
I do not understand...
Trump supporters who consider that poor excuse for a human being as their savior, chosen by the Almighty, when his behavior is far more representative of the Anti-Christ.
As for his recent crowing about his cognitive test. The specific test he "ACED" per his Truth Social statement is likely to have been the MoCA test. See below. Remember "person, woman, man, camera, TV?" It's a dementia test. His self-congratulation more likely indicates a low IQ rather than his claim of high IQ.
To be continued...(there's enough malfeasance to be addressed for the next 1000 years).
